While the right could be authoritarian, in most cases it isnt, it focuses on self-discipline and self-governance.
The left is always authoritarian, anarchists in the 1800 turned into bolshevist-marxists by 1900. You have to force equality because it is unnatural, and naturally people are unequal.
So you're saying Mussolini wasn't a right-wing authoritarian? Or that the Liberal left Dutch society is authoritarian? The Dutch culture is quite similar to what Libertarianism promises (and has not had a chance to deliver so far)
Yes he was a right wing authoritarian.
I am talking about right wing libertarianism, read my full post before responding to snippets taken out of context.
Everything I responded to was in context.
If you say "The left is always authoritarian", I provided an example of left labelled politics that is liberal, not authoritarian. It's entirely reasonable to point out how right labelled politics can be just as tyrranical, hence left and right is not the route to finding freedom or liberalism. Left and right deliberately divides freedom in half, as I've said.
To illustrate further:
Presumably, as someone who identifies with the right label, you're a big fan of:
- Monarchies (literally the opposite of freedom and self determinism, it's a "mono-archy")
- Banning recreational drugs (wanna mess with the freedom of others, huh)
- Police state thuggery against vulnerable people (but they're all criminals just waiting to happen though, right?)
- Traditional family values (it says in the Bible "let no man put asunder", therefore your divorce is a sin!)
- Heavily patrolled national borders and restrictive policies for foreigners to cross (tekkin' yer jobs? What about the free-market?)
You see, "rightists" have equally unpalatable characteristics also, if you don't choose to pretend they don't exist. That's why Libertarianism doesn't conform to any of those bullet points. Like I said, throw away the bullshit from the "right", AND the bullshit from the "left", and you've got anarchism/libertariansim left over.