Hi CZ, thank you for your valuable input.
Are you currently supporting 1blocklologist's and Block chain Development's vision for BBR in the future?
Is there anything that they should be working on right now, to make the smoothest transition to a new development team?
Thanks again for all of your great work!

At the moment i can say only that 1blocklologist didn't get my trust yet.
He rejected to contribute to BBR repository with my code review, he did't show competence in BBR code base, he didn't do any improvements yet.
For me it looks like a fake, so be careful.
Zoidberg.
Has your opinion changed? Although I have in the past questioned the 1% developer mining share at times when you have not been active I share your concerns in this case.
My current opinion is as follows:
Negatives:
1. Currently I consider the
original GitHub repository to be official repository not the new
BlockChainDevelopmentCompany repository. Zoidberg has proven a high level of understanding of the Boolberry codebase and is willing to review pull requests from new developers.
2. I don't like that 1blocklologist changed the
Bitcointalk link on the r/boolberry sidebar to the new moderated thread which contains links to the new GitHub
3. I dislike the new BBR
masternode plan4. I dislike the plan to change the
BBR ticker to XBR5. I dislike all the Boolberry
price target speculation. Talk without a significant demonstration of development ability reminds me too much of pump an dump tactics common in other coins
Positives:
1. It is nice to have interest from a new developer since you have not been active in a long time
2. Since you have not been active I like the proposal to remove the 1% developer mining reward (my mind could be changed if you started developing again)