The critics - and there are only a couple - are people that have no ability to contribute to the code, no resources to mine, and I doubt their positions in Boolberry are enough to influence the market when their confidence wavers. The people that have any of those three things are pretty content with the direction of things. They aren't complaining.
You lose credibility every day by attacking your "critics". Anyone reading this thread knows it is far more than a "couple" who do not trust you. You have no idea if some of your critics have an ability to code, resources to mine or what their BBR market positions might be. You are the newcomer here and long time community members trust you less the more often you continue to make such false statements.
CryptoZoidberg absolutely has more credibility than you among this community so attacking him is not helping you either.
If you want to help, then create a worthwhile pull request and stop spending time here attacking long time community members.
That was not a reference to CZ, the bottom of that post has a compliment to CZ
the statement was to show a contrast between what is written, versus what the miners and other silent participants actually do. the aggregate crowd is optimistic about any scenario in the development of boolberry.
It would be disingenuous for me not to have an opinion about what people choose to use as qualifiers for my credibility. Some of it is great criticism, a lot of it is arbitrary and based on misunderstandings, and my responses have resulted in better outcomes with people that initially had different conclusions.
You're right though, back to the code!