Ninjastic
Home
Search
Users
Boards
Addresses
Ctrl + K
Toggle theme
Open menu
Post
Edited versions
Quotes to this post
Post
1667865
Topic
157130
Board
Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Decentralised crime fighting using private set intersection protocols
by
Jaagu
on
24/03/2013, 15:22:16 UTC
Quote from: DigitalHermit on March 24, 2013, 02:39:22 PM
This concept has been discussed at length before and vigorously rejected:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=85433.0
This not the first time Mike is taking up the same rhyme:
Freezing BitCoin addresses by regulating miners
April 17, 2011
by Mike Hearn
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5979.0
There is some hidden agenda, isn't it?
More on the same topic:
What if bitcoins that can be tracked back to Silk Road are declared 'illegal'?
June 22, 2011
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=20979.0
Governments/regulators may eventually actually *like* Bitcoin. - coin blacklists
December 02, 2011
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=53539.0;all
EDIT:
My opinion: Bitcoin (as public ledger) is information. 'Tainted'/blacklisted/whitelisted coins are censorship in the purest form. When has censorship served for the good of humankind?