I'm asking about the violation rate though, not confiscation rate.
Here's another question to think about:
If we got in a time machine and went back to replay the last year and the only difference was a rule that forced you destroy all seized fund: what % of players would have been paid previously had their funds taken?
Hi there,
Of the violation rate, still extremely low. You have to realize that the average player is not someone who bets that amount per spin,
therefore a lot of players are not affected by the rule.
Can you re-formulate that question?
Mike
Consider all the players that had their cashouts cancelled over the past year for betting over the max with a bonus.
If you weren't allowed to keep their money for yourself, what % of them would have been paid.