What would be a legitimate reason to push non-confirmed transactions over and over?
Do we need a reason to broadcast valid non-confirmed transaction to a peer?But why push a valid unconfirmed tx that shall not be accepted into any valid block ever?
Isn't re-boradcasting it over and over and keeping it in the mempool just adding to the
problem as to
I do not know.problem as to
It is understandable if your tx is good and after a few days you repush it when a bottle
neck is over, but nodes pushing for weeks or months seems like misbehavior.
No, it is not understandable.neck is over, but nodes pushing for weeks or months seems like misbehavior.
You have a right to locate all such nodes and punish their owners.
You also have a right to keep forever all tx hashes for the transactions you have deleted and ban
the peers which re-send these transactions.
Here is the question then:
Can Bitcoin attacks and attack vectors be a malicious act or a misbehavior in your eyes?
Or since it is doable or executable, it is always a justly act and there can be no injurious acts.