Just imagine the look on fudders face when ICN is added to Poloniex next week 
Imagine the look on their face when ICN goes above 0.00100 BTC & Volume surpasses ETH on POLO
Ps. Notice how every fudder is whoring out some new shitty ICO, i guess they gotta meet their bounty posting quotas
Imagine the look on their face when ICN goes above 0.00100 BTC & Volume surpasses ETH on POLO
Ps. Notice how every fudder is whoring out some new shitty ICO, i guess they gotta meet their bounty posting quotas
Keep dreaming, polo and bittrex won't add icn because icn is a share, they don't add a share, it is voilating the US laws
Singularity is also a share and is currently on bittrex.
As it seems you know alot about US laws please explain.
No, sngls is not a share/security/fund. See this
https://bittrex.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/227902667-What-is-a-compliance-review-
"We also cannot list currencies that would be construed as a security such as digital currencies that promise/market profits or represent shares of a company." Definitely icn is, remember why op post to us don't tweet bittrex any more? Maybe this reason, but bittrex may list it if they complete the review which icn is accepted.
It's not like you will be able to redeem your ICN tokens for actual shares of Iconomi GmbH which will hold/spend the ico funds. Therefore, ICN tokens are not representing shares of a company.
It's a app token, which doesn't give you any legal rights to do anything if you hold it.
Bittrex listed DAO, despite the fact that it was promising and marketing profits to token holders
You think Kraken, a regulated exchange with a team of lawyers based in San Francisco, USA, would have added ICN if it was violating US laws?