Quote from: Rassah on November 05, 2016, 01:31:06 AM

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on November 04, 2016, 11:26:48 PM

The following abbreviated table depicting recently received users' addresses et al. was just sent to Rassah:

NAME	~~NULL~~	ADDRESS	REMIT
_
_
thomkaufmann...	~~1.0~~	13ULMdY3Rd3Ax4amphDBKeCiEsM78xTmJW	0.4378
partyp	~~0.19822391~~...	1Gm6SNXwTAnCQsKQVd33e44sDC6F8bsTmo...	0.19822391
GoWest	~~6.0~~	1Ccz22btKWZEmccpPb2DFfx9JzWzhdbTVw	2.6268
dancupid	~~4.204114~~	1EQGrHozsR52n7Hkdb2MLj33f5S5UdtbHZ	1.8405611
clouds	~~1.0~~	17LeJg5tVeXaDvrcJ524f9kzB2VTfyrk7Q	0.4378
gnar1ta$	~~8.0~~	1AR8gJfoZPrQD8hn8xYjnrpy8U1BaYiomW	3.5024

Just to confirm, I should send out the next transaction of those specific amounts to those specific addresses?

Yes, Kitten, I confirm. I quadruple-checked everything, and I stand here before you all that I avow that I'm pretty sure about maybe all is quasi-perfect. Roll Eyes

TBC, as previously stipulated early in this thread (perhaps in the OP sans peaking), partyp is being reimbursed 1:1 due to the exchange rate when he made his [relatively small] singular donation, thus earning a few extra bucks which we easily have covered.