Sorry, my bad. I support these actions against scam.
It's spam we're talking about. Scams are a whole other thing.
But I don't think that SMAS will have affect to forum post quality. Removed users will join other campaigns (there are full of it, paying in altcoins) and will continue to spam.
As long as other campaigns keep enrolling those members kicked from smas campaigns/listed on the smas banlist, they might continue to do so.
Our goal is not only to ban users from our own campaigns, but also to raise awareness. Ideally, other campaigns would adapt to the list or start maintaining their own.
Word "scam" was only typing mistake. I understand difference.
I think problem is that some campaign managers don't care much about participants post quality. Like it was on Bitmixer campaign earlier. Users enrolls automatically and starts to spam without any control.