The following abbreviated table depicting recently received users' addresses et al. was just sent to Rassah:
NAME | NULL
| ADDRESS | REMIT |
_ | | | |
_ | | | |
thomkaufmann... | 1.0 | 13ULMdY3Rd3Ax4amphDBKeCiEsM78xTmJW | 0.4378 |
partyp | 0.19822391... | 1Gm6SNXwTAnCQsKQVd33e44sDC6F8bsTmo... | 0.19822391 |
GoWest | 6.0 | 1Ccz22btKWZEmccpPb2DFfx9JzWzhdbTVw | 2.6268 |
dancupid | 4.204114 | 1EQGrHozsR52n7Hkdb2MLj33f5S5UdtbHZ | 1.8405611 |
clouds | 1.0 | 17LeJg5tVeXaDvrcJ524f9kzB2VTfyrk7Q | 0.4378 |
gnar1ta$ | 8.0 | 1AR8gJfoZPrQD8hn8xYjnrpy8U1BaYiomW | 3.5024 |
Just to confirm, I should send out the next transaction of those specific amounts to those specific addresses?
Yes, Kitten, I confirm. I quadruple-checked everything, and I stand here before you all that I avow that I'm pretty sure about maybe all is quasi-perfect.

TBC, as previously stipulated early in this thread (perhaps in the OP sans peaking), partyp is being reimbursed 1:1 due to the exchange rate when he made his [relatively small] singular donation, thus earning a few extra bucks which we easily have covered.