Thanks to all those who explained why they prefer Claymore/Windows over silentarmy/Linux.
To rednoW who said "And Claymore is faster, especially on Tahiti" -> this is not true, silentarmy matches or surpasses Claymore even on Tahiti (especially when taking into account its 2.5% dev fee).
Anyway it is apparent to me that many features (temp/fan monitoring, pool failover, Windows support, etc) are what you guys want in a miner. So I will take this into consideration to prioritize my future developments. But on the other I agree with the 80/20 rule: like Bitcoin in its early GPU mining days, it seems 80% of the hashrate comes from 20% of people who operate large Linux mining farms, while 20% of the hashrate is from 80% of people who operate smaller hobbyist Windows mining farms.
More so then any of this, you realize you're in a Nvidia thread and that almost all the users here are Nvidia users? Currently there is no Nvidia miner besides the Nheqminer.
I disagree entirely that the majority of nethash comes from Nix mining as well. People like to assume nix is this abomitable monster that controls everything... There has to be a reason to use it. Why would you use it when everything is worse about it in this example? Not only are GPU drivers more robust in windows, but tweaking and management is also much more robust. This isn't the way it works for other parts of the IT industry, but it in this case it's definitely true.
A lot of the hash coming from a small amount of miners? Sure. That means they must use nix? No.