NEM Apostille imo is not even comparable, simply because it's that much better. However I still have factoids and I think the market is big enough for both projects. But if I were a big company I'd 1000 times rather use Apostille than Factom, it's really that good. Also I feel that Factom doesn't really care about its factoid investors, there still isn't an easy wallet yet, imo there is a lack of transparancy and the whole set-up is kinda like Ethereum; too damn complicated and not well thought out. Just ideas and building for the sake of building. Also there is a lot of fog when it comes to deadlines and stuff. Wasn't milestone 2 supposed to be here already? As an investor I don't know what they are doing, they don't give us updates.
Now compare that with NEM Apostille; an easy, holistic, elegant, uniquely structured, well thought out and dynamic notarization service on the blockchain that is on par with the invention of the internet IMO. Factom is a nice bike but Apostille is like a lambo.
Now compare that with NEM Apostille; an easy, holistic, elegant, uniquely structured, well thought out and dynamic notarization service on the blockchain that is on par with the invention of the internet IMO. Factom is a nice bike but Apostille is like a lambo.
NEM = EXPANSE
FACTOM = ETH
Nuff, said
I think you mean the other way around lol. Well maybe I am wrong, I don't know, as an investor I don't like to rely on blind faith, it could be that Factom devs are doing great things behind the scenes, that partnerships will pay off and that market cap will explode. But time will tell who is right and who is wrong. Will be fun to evaluate next year to find out who has the "told you so". 
On a sidenote, Factom already has partnerships (not sure?) and it's being used already, so hence I can understand why people think it's still a good investment, might even explode in market cap at some point in time. Hence I am still hodling.