The only thing I interrupted was a growing dog pile of insult hurling and accusations. I'm all for using forums as an open exchange of ideas, but that's clearly not was I was seeing being demonstrated here. See this thing we're doing now? This is slightly closer to resembling a discussion. Again, you're more than welcome to have your little bandwagons, but that's gonna get called out too. You call it rail-roading, I call it testing the resilience of your ideas. If they're as strong as you claim, they'll hold up. Just like Bitcoin.
That only holds true for people with honest proposals. You seem to be trying to prop up the idea that all the previous hard-fork proposals were well-intentioned, it should be pretty obvious to those with a little discernment that the real idea is to pressurise and destablise Bitcoin with fabricated internal struggles.
You, DooMAD, are throwing gasoline on that particular fire every chance you get. Why?