Now this is completely confusing. Additional 15% to
which number? There is a plethora of different ways to interpret this. Why this should be formulated in such an unclear way?
There is a undefined terminology used here. Am I correct when assuming this: "round #1" - is the timeframe of , "stage 1" is the 1-st week of "round #2" (dates here, please!)
ca333, please confirm this interpretation from
kwest is correct:
The 10% of all tokens is no longer valid, we realized that it was a bad idea. So the early supporters get a 15% bonus if they remain in escrow. And it's NOT 15% of all tokens, just a bonus. In other words, people that join the new ICO in the first week gets 33% bonus. Early adopters that remain in escrow get 33 + 15 = 48% bonus.
/confirmedAnd if it is correct, please specify exactly which investors will get those 48%! There are at least two ways to interpret this:
Option 1: the ones who invested in 9 days of 'early investor' bonus (Oct 12 - Oct 21)
Option 2: the ones who invested before you posted this update (Oct 12 - Nov 6)
Which one is correct (if any)?
PS. Please be more specific in what you post. I understand you are not economist or lawyer, but anything said, should be said the way so it allows only one interpretation... I hope you are more precise when you're coding...
EDIT: One additional question: did you agree your changes with SebastianJu? What you specified above could affect the escrow agreement (specifically - the dates on roadmap, which escrow agreement refers to), so this should be agreed with escrow to see if he doesn't see obstacles here.
It should not be confusing. The wording was choosen precise and should not leave big space for interpretations. I apologize if it was not clear enough from subjective perspective.
Correct, round #1 was the first run. Everybody who invested before we made the update get the 48% bonus. The exact dates get set when we release the token-layer (like aforementioned: this month).
I hope you are more precise when you're coding...
- there is no reason of becoming offensive. As i told: I apologize for any inconvenience. I hope all is clear now.
Yes all was discussed and agreed with SebastianJu.