You people complaining about how the devs aren't pushing this coin onto bigger exchanges are blind to how good of a sign this could be.
Let's think about this, what incentive do devs usually have to get listed on a high volume exchange as quickly as possible?
I think the fact that they are not concerned about the success of speculators in the short term is telling of what they expect in the future. It indicates to me that they are more concerned about their long term investors and the long term goals of the project than they are of impatient ICO pump and dump traders.
I'm a big believer in ICONOMI, but to be fair, lot of people invested because Devs promised ICN will be traded on the biggest exchanges.
If Devs said they don't intend to list on Polo & Rex after distribution, then I don't think they would have raised more than $2-3m.
So for now... it does feel like a
Bait and Switch.Devs should do right by their investors and list on Polo & Rex and let them trade as they please, and if the ICONOMI products are really great, we won't see any dumping.
I'm a big believer in ICONOMI, but to be fair, lot of people invested because Devs promised ICN will be traded on the biggest exchanges.
Just want to ask you (I'm not trying to be the wise guy, or cynical) - how those 2 parts in the sentence are not controversial?
From one hand you have the "I'm a big believer" part, and from the other hand the "lot of people..."
If you are a big believer, why do you care about price less than 3 weeks after coin distribution, and
way before the first planned and pre-announced milestone?
If you are a big believer, how come you care about why other people invested and whether they are happy with their investment or not?