Just because you do not agree with what I wrote does not mean it's not in line with the topic.
You ask us to define spam -> I give you examples of spam and now you deny them? If you're going to use such reasoning, then responding here is a waste of my (and anyone else's) time.
I am not attacking you, whatever happened to freedom of speech?
I have not claimed that. Read my post again:
The other cases that I've encountered are :
1) Avoiding guilt -> like in OP's case.
2) Attacking me.