I have removed the negative feedback for now. But there was simply no reason to stop communicating while claiming that "we have an escrow" and that investors should ask me about how long this will take. Now you say it is still open if the already invested funds will be forwarded to a potential future escrow address.
This does not really look like you were in a hurry to provide escrow safety on this crowdsale. Though in the meanwhile it looked like I escrow on here. It was a surprise that this escrow is already half through already also. This is not how an ICO should go.
In any case... if all investors that already invested were aware that I actually do not escrow yet then I don't see a problem. But for me having to see that the thread says "we have an escrow" and that Iam the one to be claimed the escrow while the ICO is already half through is not what I would have awaited to see. It would have been me who would have been asked later by investors where their coins are when in fact I would not have them.
Anyway... you should decide quickly what you want since it does not make much sense to escrow something that you already started long ago.
I don't want to be abused so please check things out fast. Since what I heard so far did not sound bad.
Might be I overreacted but not hearing anything from you for two days after I found out that the Crowdfund is running already half of its time did not sound well to me.
The crowdsale has started on 01 November. It is stated in our articles and also in a big banner on the very first page of the thread. The fact that you discovered it after a week of communication only pushes us to a conclusion that you were not interested enough and didn't pay even a little time or attention to the project. That conclusion is supported by the very obvious questions from you, which we received during over short project discussion. We do have an escrow, but since it's a public figure, people were not satisfied with him. For that reason, we started to look for someone local and were advised to contact you. The crowdsale is not going to be our primary source of funds. We wanted to find partners, create a community, see the reaction of potential users, and receive their feedback. So, we don't see much trouble in adding escrow halfway trough a crowdsale. Your quick judgment has disappointed us. We are not ready to hand the future of the project, we spent so much time and effort on, to such an impulsive person. We do hope that you will correct your post since we never did anything to harm you or your good name on Bitcointalk.org or anywhere else.
See here a cached page:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1666609.0 One would have to search for it to know that you already started the investments without having an escrow already and that you did not postpone the start until the escrow address is ready which usually happens in such a case.
And of course I need to ask safety related questions to the project since I do not have time to crawl through all the various whitepapers, articles and whatever for every ICO I get asked to escrow. I have many negotiations at the same time so for an interested dev it should be possible to answer all the questions which would have been needed to answer. Since... obviously... the escrow is a person who stand between dev and investors and he needs to provide safety to both sides.
I'm fine with your decision since I do not like how this went and I do not really trust it. I would have done it for protecting investors anyway but I'm happy to give up on that task totally now.
In any case I hope for the best for the project since it looks interesting. Hope the wishes of investors come true.