Murder unless in self-defence is wrong, no matter how you look at it.
So, how would you classify a mother that killed a person that she perceived as threatning the life of her baby?
What are the basic morals that apply here?
I made a mistake. What I meant to say was: Murder unless in defense of life and property is wrong.
I see no moral objection against the mother killing a person that is threatening the life of her baby.
Of course things like murder are obvious, but what if a serial killer is murdered?
Same here. No objection against killing a serial killer in defense of someones life.
imo NAP should be the center of society and not a centralized authority called the state.