Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
Can you provide some power consumption data for 290/290x/390? Per card or rig.
the rigs are offsite - will post when I access them tomorrow morning.
I updated remotely all the rigs that are with 1600w PSUs = 7x 370s, 5 x 390s, 6 x Nanos, and 6 x 480s.
With CDM v7.4, these rigs are mining ETH full speed, ethi 16 and nearly 80-85% of PSU.
But with CZM v7, these rigs are well under 65-70% of PSU.
Hope the CZM v8 doesnt reach CDM power draw because CZM runs with less heat and significantly lower power - and all these good points will be neutralised when CZM v8 equals CDM v7.4 powerdraw.
3x r9 390 + 1x r9 290 = 1130w-1150w - 1120 h/s
3x r9 390 = 930w-950w - 885 h/s
3x r9 290 = 830w-850w - 725 h/s
in total 2730 h/s = 2890w - 2950w