I'm still waiting for larger block sizes, or SegWit which could assuredly help on the short term
Segwit
is an increase in the Blocksize. There is no "larger blocks, or Segwit"
Miners, and all BTC developers should understand that BTC's growth requires a growing infrastructure and includes a growing block size. Visa wasn't able to handle thousands of transactions every second some decades ago, but Visa has good managers and they anticipated the growth of the network. BTC needs to do the same. If I'm reasonable, I'd say the block size should be increased 50% each year.
What makes you think that blocksize changes are the only way to increase the transaction rate? If you were reasonable, you'd say that blocksize increases should be a last resort, and that anything else that improves the transaction rate should be implemented before that.
Yes, Segwit will effectively allow larger blocks, but that's not its main purpose, and the increase is marginal.
I want to be reasonable. If we could find a way to - I don't know how - reduce the size of transactions to fit more inside a block, I'd be happy, but if we want
BTC's use to increase 10-fold, then 100-fold, we will have to increase the block size, and I don't see it as a big deal. The blockchain will be more than 100 Go in a few weeks, and nobody cares. Why should I care about the block size?