I come to understand what he says.
But with his idea of elections
A much more obvious example.
90% subsidy remaining after the 7th node.
8th node 420000 votes 100% subsidy
9th node 39000 votes 90% subsidy
Winner on 9th when he does not have 10% of votes than 8th. The subsidy becomes the most important point.
This seems very unfair neither democratic to me.
Ok, I understand now.
Unfortunately that's the situation if the notary node wants our guaranteed subsidy. There's no perfect solution.
The notary nodes need to think hard where they set the required subsidy. If they set it to 100%, then in other words they say that they are not willing to take the financial risk and cannot operate the node with just 90% subsidy.
It's not perfect, but the best solution we came up with.
I think KMD should value the ICO price.You really believe that Komodo can be worth $ 0