Okay....I understand the necessity to have a process to reduce spam by eliminating those who abuse the signature campaigns but isn't that the responsibility of each individual campaign manager?  I don't understand the intent of building a collusion network of managers to centralize all campaigns under a single rule....What is the goal of such a network?  Will it end up being a method by which a single group of advertisers, with common interests and investments, have the ability to eliminate their competition via labeling  other advertisers as "rogue" members then working together to label other advertisers' campaign members as spammers and coloring their competition's reputation with red for not falling in line?  What is the ultimate intent of this organization?  Mob rules?  I understand the necessity to eliminate spam; I don't understand the intent of building a centralized authority to accomplish that goal....it seems like a slippery slope.