Just thought I would share my benchmarking of the R9 nano.
All power measurements were done at the wall to be 100% accurate.
Benchmarks were done with Claymore ZEC - v8.0 (-i 4)
Stock:
1 gpu: ZEC: 272 h/s Watts: 200w
-100mV ROM
1 gpu: ZEC: 211 h/s Watts: 91w
-125mV ROM
1 gpu: ZEC: 217 h/s Watts: 90w
you are missing a -100 core undervolt benchmark for stock
Marvell is correct.
using AB, crank down core to -100 -mV or -96 mV, you can easily get 150watts on stock card - it's a easily forgiving card.
That is right. The memory undervolt does not make much differnce. It is 1W difference from -100mV to 125mV.