Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: did you agree moderator need to controlling signature managers
by
deisik
on 29/11/2016, 18:10:27 UTC
1) Banning...
2) Banning...
3) Banning...

You seem to be hell-bent on ultimately banning everyone

I think you guys missed the point of this guys post? I feel like he is talking about our SMAS team and we need our opinions moderated. If thats the case i think hes wrong obv. We are not just adding ppl to the list for the hell of it. We are actually adding the ppl who need to be added. Will we stop all the spam? No, but we will stop hundreds of accounts from being able to spam. And we will continue our efforts and try to help the forum be a more enjoyable place for ppl to come to

It must be an insane waste of time and effort, but maybe we are just not there yet to feel it in full. Today you ban hundreds of accounts (and waste hundreds of hours) and get thousands of farmed accounts tomorrow. If you missed my suggestion how to resolve this issue effectively and efficiently, I can repeat it here. Instead of doing the same thing all over again and turning it into a Sisyphean toil, all signatures should be disabled by default until enabled on personal basis by a moderator or trusted user on the member's request. Moderators are still reading all these posts, so it won't make their job any harder, but the amount of shit posting will decrease multifold since unbridled farming (for the sake of evading bans) will be pretty much meaningless under these circumstances...

But if you prefer fighting windmills, then more power to you