What are the implications in the comparison of efficiency/functionality of the following Rigs:
A) 2 xfx R9 295X2 = ~$900 = ~1000W = 1120 SOLs ZEC, 120MHs ETH
B) 6 RX 470s = ~$1100 = ~880W = 1120 SOLs ZEC, 164MHs ETH
C) 5 R9 390 = ~$1200 = ~800W = 1250 SOLs ZEC, ____MHs ETH
I think all of details / presumptions are correct. This would lead me to believe, as it stands, that C would be the most efficient option...correct?
You might want to check power usage numbers again when mining ETH as its considerably higher than when mining ZEC.
You have a very good point there! I am rephrasing:
Also, the assumption would be that there would not be dual mining with ETH, ETH only.
What are the implications in the comparison of efficiency/functionality of the following Rigs:
A) 2 xfx R9 295X2 = ~$900 = ~1000W = 1120 SOLs ZEC; ~___W = 120MHs ETH
B) 6 RX 470s = ~$1100 = ~880W = 1120 SOLs ZEC; ~920W = 164MHs ETH
C) 5 R9 390 = ~$1200 = ~800W = 1250 SOLs ZEC; ~___W =____MHs ETH
I think all of details / presumptions are correct. This would lead me to believe, as it stands, that C would be the most efficient option...correct?