Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no
Chat logs are worthless and can be doctored.
But I really did tell Lauda that. 
Lauda is also very inconsistent in who gets a negative rating and who gets a neutral rating as he is leaving both negative and neutral ratings for the exact same activity, that reasonably does not warrant a rating at all.
That is most certainly not the case. In order to understand, you'd have to look into the ratings rather than just make a superficial observation and jump to conclusions. All ratings are handed out on a case-by-case basis, i.e. several factors are considered (e.g. history of account, potential risk, post quality, et al.). For example, the three accounts that are being sold and have received neutral ratings did so because they are 'non-spammy' accounts (which is a rare event on its own).FYI I'm not the only person tagging for the activates of spamming, account trading and whatnot, but you don't seem to care about those as much as you care about me.
P.S. Minifrij still got some unanswered questions that you seem to be dodging.