From what I understand....Core wants BTC mainly to be a 'store of value' thus keeping BTC decentralised away from concentration of miners.....and the miners see this as silly
in that they want to push the block size up to scale with BTC for more adoption and more transactions thus more $$$ in fees for them.....

This impasse may never go away......because imho core could care less if it ever evolves beyond a store of value if the price stays sideways or goes up....

miners however imho are in a worse boat in that eventually, they won't be able to mine BTC anymore due to difficulty and thus decentralization happens from that direction

anyway...

but I'm clueless but it is how I see this....only real way a compromise will happen imho is a crisis where/if/how it is shown in a big price drop that block size increase is really needed
but by then it will be a complete cluster.....anyway power games..no clean hands in this issue I'm afraid

but again I know zip and above could be completely wrong..this just represents my current thoughts on this somewhat lame issue