What bullshit.
What's the rationale behind this hiding someone's posts without telling them that it's being done?
rbtc can't tell people that it's being done because then they'd have to admit that they too moderate things, which would break their narrative that the difference between rbtc and rbitcoin is that rbtc is 'uncensored'.
What definition of "public figure" do they use?
Apparently one that defines Gavin Andresen as not a public figure but defines me as one (since no action is taken about the basically daily stream of attack comments naming me on rbtc-- ... though I never asked for any action to be taken with respect to them other than letting me post rebuttals, but they've taken that away.)
But whatever, it's their site-- they can have dumb rules.