Regardless of Greg's behavior, I believe Synereo should not behave inappropriate as well. In consideration to all second crowdsale investors who decided to invest based on all documentation provided by Synereo at that time, the company should open the possibility of a refund. It means only for those who request it, based on the impossibility of targeting RChain development as stated in the crowdsale documentation.

If necessary, Synereo could do a crowdfund based on this new scenario (and new commitments) and see what happens.

Much fairer with all 2nd crowdsale investors. Otherwise, it would look like a scam (sale of AMPs for a purpose no longer targeted).