yes, i was going to say the same thing. first of all, how many developers and economic thinkers of even above-average abilities (for, say, an open-source project) do you think are associated with bitcoin development? my estimate is 6, and in any event it's less than a dozen. second, the issue has been quite contentious, and unresolved, for some time. [citation needed]
lulz oh you are so funny. 
and you're childish, at least judging from your reply.
see http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=6284.0, for a start. i concur with the original poster's summary:
Quote
The thread is beginning to show something I find frightening. There exists no generally accepted model or even set of rules for Bitcoin in the future. A portion of people claim that removing the transaction limit will do no harm, the others use it as the last argument why Bitcoin will not enter the failure scenario described.