If ANON was needed so badly why did the dev's not submit the idea to the Bitcoin core dev's foundation etc ?
Was it because they knew it would be rejected ?
Was it because they knew it would be rejected ?
Bitcoin struggles with even smaller updates like the blocksize.
Implementing anon would be probably equal to cold fusion for BTC devs.
I think a good portion of users use BTC because of pseudoanonymity. Now they can have the real thing.
Monero is basically what BTC was meant to be.