This is pure BS. More CO2 means an increase in the temperature. Even a 4-year old kid will be able to understand that. And regarding that article, I am not even going to read it. Research has become too much politicized these days.
You Millennials fools. I already refuted the "fact" about greenhouses cases driving the thermodynamics! The tail doesn't wag the dog:
well no, it's a well known fact that the composition of the atmosphere does have an effect on the thermodynamics of planets. Different gases in the atmosphere will cause the planet to retain more or less heat. We can see this by studying other planets.
You've got that backasswards. The
long-term composition of the atmosphere is dictated by the thermodynamics of the earth, not vice versa. The longer explanation of why that is so is your homework assignment. I will give you one tidbit to start with, which is that CO2 lags temperature rises (and declines) by 200 - 800 years because it is the warming and cooling of the oceans that cause the release of more or less CO2 from the massive mass of the oceans. Humans can't impact enough mass to offset the effect on the oceans. The Earth is a self-stabilizing system because of this huge heatsink, and the main heat sources are internal below the crust and the Sun (by many orders-of-magnitude than anything humans can do on a long-term basis).
The lag is an irrefutable fact seen in 100,000s of years (if not more, I forget) of ice core data.
You fools will believe any junk "science" put out by the socialist system that is "protecting" and "educating" you. Good luck with that. Mein Kampf.
If they have "science" to tell you FruitLoops are nutritional, you'll believe that also.