The other one is newer and has idiotic claims. I also have the software available on my site, and you can test the 1% version. The 0% version is with the devfee seconds completely removed. Pretty obvious who is the least garbage here.


You're actually wrong on all counts which is rare. It's not greedy if you compare it to Claymore's 2% fee. That alone is the most greedy when it comes to digital software. You're also wrong about it being anti-community. There's no basis for that claim. And it's also a really good price.


On what part of the planet would you think something on the internet wouldn't keep showing up?