We are re-balancing things.
I think people vastly under estimate the costs that both app owners and Moneypot owners have to take on.
App Owners and Moneypot Owners both took a cut in the new changes that will take place. It will be also be made that for the period of the announcement going backward, all the investors invested at that point will stand to have made bitcoin from their past investment.
I honestly don't know what else investors could ask for. If Moneypot wasn't expanding our services and focusing on development all while committing ourselves to the people who are part of Moneypot, we would have already taken the bankroll private because it is a great position to be in.
With Moneypot, you get multiple sites that you are invested into with many more to come in the next year not to mention several new products that should lead to increased traffic and volume.
Moneypot Owners take on a great deal amount of risk that goes beyond just bitcoin and we end up with one of the lowest cuts in the industry. I'd also argue that our costs are higher than most sites as well.
Again thanks for your explanation and somehow I'm not convinced with your explanation that owners only come forward to take the cut when investors make money but when investors lose money don't want to take part of it.
Anyway, you're the owner of the site, and you can decide the rules, and I can decide whether want to invest or not.
Nothing is personal here....
Edit -
If that is applicable, then you should also consider implementing MP and App owners need to pay investors 10% each, if Investor loses money for any particular week then I think it is a balanced formula otherwise it is biased to help only MP and App owners..
The point is that it is supposed to be biased. They run the platforms/apps where people bet with, and need BTC to run things.
When you run a business then should be ready to take a loss as well but if you want to be always safer side then it is not balanced. No one is forcing to run a show but they are running because they are making profit. That is the logic..
Don't forget the cost of running an app and writing the script, app owners would pay domain, hosting and promotion which investors don't take part so it will cost more for the app owners specially if there are only very few bet volume on his/her app. If you think app owners make much profit, you can try hiring someone to make mp script for you, pay him and buy domain plus hosting and extra expense on promotion if you want. How much would you need only for those things?
One more thing, app owners bring players to fight with the investors and giving them the edge
If an app owner will have to lose money if someone wins big, i think he would rather be an investor instead of wasting money running his own app. Right?
By your statement you clearly wants an app owner to be owner and investor at the same time. Why not ask every investor to make their own app instead?