Quote from: BTCMORGAN on December 25, 2016, 09:52:10 PM

Quote from: wings.ai on December 25, 2016, 09:09:19 PM

Quote from: BTCMORGAN on December 25, 2016, 08:35:33 PM

Quote from: Densitymax on December 25, 2016, 02:35:20 PM

Quote from: YNWA2806 on December 25, 2016, 12:03:12 PM

Quote from: BitBanksy on December 25, 2016, 10:27:53 AM

Quote from: MFahad

Disclaimer: I was not aware of the stupid allocation rules when investing. In fact, I actually didn't want to invest with BTC but with ETH, but then there was some stupid exclusive bonus for BTC investors. MISLEADING!

Example:
1 BTC investment (=$908) gives me 33,322 Wings
867.7 ETC investment (=$908) gives me 247,326 Wings

That's more than 7 times more WINGS for the same amount of dollars in value!

You may get 7 times more WINGS if you invest in ETC now... but remember that the final calculations will rely on current total funds collected. Estimations will change as new funds are received. See terms & conditions for further details.

That's a freake'n scandal.......Why won't you give us a statement on the subject??
This is not the way to go with your first investors.

Yes, but no one will not change rules during game. It will not be fair to users who have carefully read whitepaper.

It's not about changing the rules, its about proving yourself to be fair and trustworthy. It's about understanding their true motivations and intentions as to the people giving them funds and to the future of the project itself. Many manufacturers of products make unintentional mistakes with pricing, but still go out and correct them in order to gain consumer trust, the people they need to actually make them successful.

Given the lack of response from anyone from the WINGS team on this and how they've decided to dangle the public calculator in everyone's faces now to show the imbalance, this seems to be a ploy to get more $$$ out of the BTC investors in order to level off the imbalance- as their other marketing tactics seem to be failing to get them more $$$ from new investors. This paints their intentions as greedy and untrustworthy. What's to stop them from also dangling the "donation" clause as someone earlier mentioned right after the ICO is over and say gee, we've decided to no longer continue this project, did your read the abandonment clause thank you for your generous donations this holiday season??

If they actually came out and said that this was unintentional and they will correct the allocation at the end in order to make it fair to everyone that invested, then I would actually invest more because they would prove themselves to be trustworthy. As I said, a minor imbalance, I can understand, but 7X is seriously unacceptable and unfair.

Again, its all about character and intention which seems to be nefarious. At this point, I am requesting someone from the WINGS team to please refund me my BTC as I am no longer interested in this project. To investors sitting on the sideline, I would not recommend investing in this project at this point. I will also be emailing Smith & Crown and ICORATING.COM and notifying them of this situation and hopefully, this will deter people from getting screwed over. If you are a BTC investor, please stand up and speak up!!!

The intention is that the foundation has a good allocation of various coins. So that it is not at the mercy of the volatile crypto markets

Wings.AI. Then the way you attempted to to execute this good allocation was clearly wrong- because the actual outcome was a severe bad allocation to your BTC investors by a huge magnitude. I believe that you can agree the you did not intend this outcome based on your claimed intention of a fair allocation. Correct? If so, then you need to correct your execution in order achieve your initial intention of a fair allocation which is what you are claiming all along.

Secondly, The issue is further magnified by the fact that you created the appearance of an additional incentive for early investors in BTC in the beginning which clearly has backfired and the outcome now is the exact opposite of your claimed intentions. is this the impression you want to give us? Think about it. Trust is an important thing. Fix this and you will send a strong message to the people on the sidelines that you are trustworthy and willing to correct mistakes to deliver on your true intentions.

As I've mentioned, many people are sitting on the sidelines watching to see what happens. If you screw over your current investors, whether intentional or unintentional, then you are sending a strong message that you are only looking out for yourselves and don't have the best intentions of investors. Which message do you chose to send?

Hey, btcmoron. The ico allocation per coin was stated multiple times. There is a saying out there,
"Before investing, do your due diligence."

And, you should calm down. The last few days has brought in large amounts of altcoins. Most likely, the allocations will be damn near equal at the end of the crowd fund.