Re: ♠BETCOIN.AG♠👺 OFFICIAL THREAD 👹 The Poker Sports Casino 🖕UNCENSORED🖕

- snip -

You can't, of course, because I've gone on record saying that I don't agree with what GP is doing ITT and that I think he should stop because he isn't helping.

What would help in your opinion, what is your goal?

You not spamming your affiliate portal would help, in my opinion. - snip-

Please explain how to pay the time consuming and expensive costs of legal action in regards to online gaming without having a revenue stream? This would be such a great solution, you could doubtless get a patent on it!

Please post any proof that you've paid for legal action.

Your question sounds like a 5 years old asking! Everyone with a decent knowledge knows that legal action in regards to online gaming is very time consuming and costly. There is no need to ask for proof and I have spent so far over 2000 unpaid hours of my time and a 5 digit amount in cash.

Only incompetent people like you, who have no knowledge about international online gaming structure, could think that getting criminal and court cases initiated would be time and cost free. Roll Eyes

Quote from: DarkDays on October 31, 2016, 05:11:53 AM

My goal is to hold Betcoin accountable for what they have done with the ultimate goal of having them NOT exit scam as Full Flush, Lock, AB, UB, FTP, JetSet, PokerSpot, and many many others have done. And, of course, if they do, to prevent the most people from losing money as humanly possible.

However, as you are the criminal online gaming operator "destroyer" (as you claim above), you have now the opportunity to pay the required around $1,500 - $2,500 court fees to start a court case in regards to Full Flush Poker.

As you claim that you are in the process to stop and hold betcoin.ag liable, I can inform that I know the applicable juristictions and responsible parties to sue.

The only thing you have to do know (to let your claim come true), is to put the required 5 digit amount to an escrow account and I will organize everything. Wink

As you claim that revenue streams are not required to pay legal proceeding expenses, it should be no problem for you to put the money on the table.

Or maybe you are only a bla, bla, bla?