Re: [PRE ANN] [RES] RESPECTONOMY - A Decentralized Social Network
I think they are trying to make another steemit , but how will you decide if the content is good or not? without censorship meaning people are free to post porn and insults to religions?
Goodness is subjective. People are allowed to post any content but it is only visible to and hosted with people who desire that content.
Your questions must be addressed. They are the right concerns. If the dev has not have anything relating to these things in the past, you can brainstorm to include the tools needed.
let me clarify. It is not us who decides the quality of the content, it's the decision of the users who view it.
When a piece of content is shared or hosted, it is hosted from that person's system. If someone decides to share porn and insults to religions, they would be the only one able to see that content. Others who want to see that content will need to download that content to be able to view it. Hence if someone who happens to download that content finds it inappropriate and/or hurtful they simply stop downloading the content from that particular author in the future.
the main purpose of publishing contents is to let it be read by anyone publicly and if possible go viral. if this isn't what is going to happen on your platform, then i guess i'd stay way from that project. its not going to be decentralized in my opinion. and its DISRESPECTFUL
Yes, respectonomy allows anyone to view any content with a possibility of it going viral; but only if the viewer WANTS TO view it.
Consider, adult content - it is allowed to be published on our platform but is only available to the publisher's followers & only hosted by publishers who decide to do so. This not only fights censorship of controversial content but also let minority views & endangered knowledge to survive.