Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | true cross-chain P2P
Quote
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
I love how we have functional software products for both XC and Blocknet and yet you cry scam, while all along we have been answering questions in slack and doing real user testing.
The only scam here is you coming here and making this statement when actual users have used the software. Why don't you go crawl back into your hole and piss off
Thats the way the main dev should talk to people. I just followed the thread and it still feels to me this is vaporware. XC never provided the promissed functionality and was once traded for 1mBTC.
You provided a roadmap and just dropped it without any explaination and when someone asked about it, the story was told "that something will be released soon" .
I still hope no new bagholders get lured into this shitcoins. The current price of BLOCK also speaks for itself
.Terrible they neglected these projects so much on here and let polo delist.
However, they have stuck around rather than totally vanish so lets hope they get some back bone and return here to the forums and stop hiding away on slack
I have bought some block back and a tiny amount of xc. Let's see what happens.
If they come back to the board with some results from months of hiding and start rebuilding the community on this board that will demonstrate to me block is not a scam. Same for xc do something with it.
If it were a full scam they would be gone by now.
Seems xc got a rough deal to me. Block can probably make a big come back if they are serious about it. XC well I hope so too although the silence on this board makes it look dead to most people.
Nobody has time for all the different slacks and other boards. Just come back to crypto capital here asap.
Lets see for 2017 the polo delist may have helped some get into block cheap or maybe produced another bunch of poor bagholders. Let;s see.
i would dump. no one with at least one brain cell will trust these scammers anymore. Just look at this: http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Record_of_Accounts. The expenses of blocknet "tracked", last entry "2015-04-23 "
It took them more then two years to deliver nearly nothing with a stunning "Estimated BTC Total is 969.31" lured out at ITO times
. Can't believe they will get away with this ...And they will stay and make maybe another 1000BTC at the next (empty promise) pump/ITO ...
Don't say you haven't been warned
I totally agree with you that that does look very bad.
Thing is Dans full ID is known. A blatant scam of nearly 1000BTC would guarantee some serious issues for him and anyone else closely involved.
Lets hope there will be a ledger of expenses arriving soon with his return to the forum and some large developments the block xc community are going to go wild over.
Lets hear what they say when there is a return to the forum. 1000 BTC can;t just have vanished on nothing.
If there is no return here and nothing comes of this in a reasonable time then ........
The link in the wiki http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Accountability_Measures - PROOF OF DEVELOPER is dead - but hey there is
https://web.archive.org/web/20150108230748/http://www.coinssource.com/trust-index/blocknet-blockand this linkedin profile which reads like a scammer's profile
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/dan-metcalf-b821a812The last time i posted something in here it got deleted. let's see how it works out this time
I think this is my first kind act this year. People save your money and don't try to be the next-gen BLOCKNET/XC bagholders
And i think the ITO will have no consequnces for him, as he can always say he underestimated the time it needs to develop these apps (although nothing really happend the last few months)
i will double posted it here just in case: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=830893.msg17377482#msg17377482