Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers
by
johhnyUA
on 03/01/2017, 19:34:52 UTC
Max must remove votes from delegates
This just shows how little you know or care about the real delegate situation. Without max (and oliver) votes there would be less contributing community members would be forging and it would be fat wallet delegates replacing most of them.

Mr.Vega, it's real world. Rich people become richer, BECAUSE they've bought more than you or delegates. It's real capitalism. Do you want more money from forging? Just buy more LISK  Cool
But, if Max and Oliver woting for their cocks*ckers, rich people ask themselves: "Why do we must buy more LISK and holding them, if developer's cocks*kers take all of our profit?"

Only pools must be in delegates.
You are making a good argument... or you know just ignoring everything we are saying.

However, here is the thing. I don't need to convince you. I just need to beat you. While you complain and make weak attempts to push your agenda I spent the last 8 months immersed in the lisk community. I ran nodes, created tools, made connections, talked to the community about various subjects, and the most important for this discussion, I spend an enarmous amount of time strategising and politicking, setting up the stage so I can forge, and I'll continue to do so.

You may get your way, I'm not going to lie. Pools may dominate the 101 one day. But do you know what's the funny part is? I would make more money that way, doing nothing just a quick voting session, than I'm doing now, running a delegate, and about dozen other things that come with being part of a large delegate community. So maybe I'm secretly rooting for you, it would be totally great for me. Not so much for lisk, but what can you do...

You're great attainment for LISK community, but you dont right with your opinion about delegates.