Jimmy's interesting analysis thinks this is an inside job, the so called Bitcointalk Account responsible was just created along with an error in your reply with who your were talking about as follows:

"he moved the coins to prove it but I he didn't intend to do wrong." Who is I HE ? Why were you referring to "him not intending to do wrong" and then also have "I didn't intend to do wrong"..... very suspicious.

I and H cannon't be mistakenly pressed on a PC Keyboard or Keyboard for phones.... reinforcing my observations of your past usage of words and sentences.... very peculiar, studies have shown that when people are typing something out or writing something, what they are typing/writing is actually the voice in their head speaking the information so mistaking I and He for "Somebody" who is not intending to do any harm when telling your version I He sounds to me like the same person that slipped up....

There is also the fact that they are building their own "Exchange" platform solely for XLTH/BTC.... what, wait, where is the source ? Why don't you want qualified people to verify your codes integrity ? Why not let them look over your source privately ? Jimmy thinks that the reason to make your own exchange is because "Normal" Exchanges won't list this kind of coin without a verifiable source, that's how it works....

This XLTH coin actually looks like you ripped a www.cryptocoincreator.com coin off & are using the same source that makes them coins but on your own website and renaming a whole heap of things to suit your currency.... This might be the next best ICO scam to be pulled off... give people free useless coins and gain their attention + support, then offer more coins then what is available freely when the ICO starts to initial investors creating a false sense of assurance getting people talking about their "unique" investment....

Jimmy will see what happens after it has all finished with still no source available