Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
Everybody knows that the most honest person in this thread is me, right after tonych 
The estimated growing is my pure speculation 
. I wanted to show (without a lot of words)that there is'nt (cant be) a valide answer at this time. Thasts the problem.. So, tony has to adjust (as he explaint) to give everyone a real chance in the next rounds..
Growing is the key (as tony also explaint) and nobody can extrapolate from only one given point (round 1).
. I wanted to show (without a lot of words)that there is'nt (cant be) a valide answer at this time. Thasts the problem.. So, tony has to adjust (as he explaint) to give everyone a real chance in the next rounds..Growing is the key (as tony also explaint) and nobody can extrapolate from only one given point (round 1).
Yes I agree with you, was just wondering if there was something else behind it apart from speculation
.Our chat yesterday caused me to make some supplementary considerations.
Good, that's what chatting is for
.2. rule: still standing bytes must be more or equal 38% (according to the old rules with 4 rounds 10%,20%,30%,38%)
After one of the abort criteria is achieved the weight of the byte is increased massively (according to the old rules). Using this we are conform with the old rules
After one of the abort criteria is achieved the weight of the byte is increased massively (according to the old rules). Using this we are conform with the old rules
I don't understand this second rule and I don't see why old rules should be taken into account, can you please explain a bit more?
Im finished with this slice.
Does this mean I can't expect an answer
?