....
Pffft.
skepticalscience.com is a joke. Even their name. Typical carbon-tax scammers in all ways, and especially in their leaning on censorship to cover for their lack of 'science'. I find
Murry Salby to be much more rigorous and credible.
Skepsci is a propaganda operation, no more or less.
I'm curious...
Could you people please define what is a reliable source of information?
Because when I read you I get that:
Independent sites like skeptical science are a joke
Private medias like "Le Monde Diplomatique" are a joke
Popular medias like CNN are a joke
Governmental or international institutes like NASA are a joke
Where do you get your data from then?