Not sure why the hostility and quick judgement though.
Because you said what I wrote was "stupid"― which is hostile and quick judgement. That is a strong word to use against someone who is not stupid. What you do you think Satoshi would have done had you said he wrote something stupid? He would have roasted you, the same as
he did to Daniel Larimer (the developer of Bitshares and Steem).
Discussion can be cordial or violent. You decide. I have no problem with cordial debate.
It doesn't mean I am infallible. I even have made some careless decisions in my life in my youth which can be characterized as stupid. But I don't think I often (if ever) have written stupid comments on serious topics on this forum. Some may totally disagree with my position (and that can often be to lack of understanding of each sides' views), but that doesn't mean it is proven that I wrote something stupid.
Interesting quote by satoshi... so satoshi wanted bitcoin to be hosted by server farms instead of individual nodes? he basically wanted bitcoin to be centralized? (because centralized nodes + centralized mining... that's what you end up getting). Pretty disappointing to see. Why would satoshi claim bitcoin is p2p cash when it would depend on corporations running nodes?
Thank god people like gmaxwell saw this mistake and they decided to keep the blocksize small and put a layer on top. Satoshi did a new mistake if he wanted what the idiots on /r/btc talk about all day. He was simply wrong.