I've asked those who claim "correlation" for, duh, the CORRELATION. Which they do claim is so astonishingly positive for those who are believers, at least. Now I've asked for the correlation. Those who made the claim need to support the claim.
Otherwise you/them appear to be resisting showing the validity of the claim made. As if you have a weak or non existent case, and you've been caught in it. As if you've been caught in a lie.
Stop the silliness please. I assume those who claimed the evidence of correlation will show the number that supports fully, partly, or not, their claim. Otherwise this last five to ten posts is yet another piece of evidence of the ducking, dodging and weaseling of politicalized climate science.
In science and engineering, the way this works is very simple.
Q. What is "A"?
A. Oh, of course. "A" is 123.45%.
Q. Thank you. That is <>
Don't act like I did nothing to prove my claim or I brought no proof of any kind.
Maybe my proofs weren't "precise enough" for you but I gave you links to article talking about correlation establishment not about correlation consequences.
And as you're talking about science and engineering you should know that science isn't about being perfectly true but about agreeing on a level of precision. So if you request proofs (which you're in right to do of course as I was making a claim) you have to tell me which level of precision you require because I brought you proofs from the beginning!