also paid voting is not the best way of making decisions if you want to be fair,
sometimes you know what is fair and people know.
If something is fair, you even do not need voting, people agree and you have no problems,
if something is not fair (even if you have positive paid voting results backing it), people see it and there will be a backlash, with time.
It is not a paid voting. You do not need to send more than 1 dent (0.00000001), only the sender's balance is taken into account when calculated.
Voting will take place only on key matters relating to the use of 42 community fund (4VsEs7wqRpoiTpmqViWRtse1P3CNgvBw4g). It's not my coins and I will not take a dent without the consent of the other holders. In addition, voting raises consciousness and activates the community.
If you do not agree, and believe that such decisions I should take personally, make a proposal and I will put it to a vote. And if the community will vote for it, there will be no more voting.
but why not to let the community vote also on proper naming and to choose a logo (there is an old one and a new one)?
a new logo is not very bad, but IMHO people remember the old one and if you fix the old coin, the logo should be original to let the coin be recognizable as the old one, let people vote on it.