.....
I see that as usual you ignore everything I write as long as it doesn't suit you.
Let's ignore the studies I linked you just because you don't like it. And give me more bullshit please.
Here are your link with only a scaling change, because you put again the absolute value of temperature which is incredibly precise of course.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/esrl-co2/offset:-350/plot/wti/scale:200So please stop. You're only bad faith here. There are arguments to oppose climate change thesis but clearly your "CO2 and temperature aren't correlated" is plain bullshit and I'm proving it every time I post. You still haven't post any proof yourself. I showed you correlation, asking you to counter my argument. And you haven't.
No, you did not "show any correlation." You've now been forced to grapple with proving your argument from the actual data, haven't you?
Well, here is your chart with your scaling factor, but with the temperature series extended its full and proper length. Now you see the slight temperature increases occurring LONG, LONG before your "alarming increase in Co2." An honest researcher at this point would say something like "Maybe the difference in the slope of the lines is Co2. But not you. You want to claim the entirety of a trend.
Also, you claim it's right to just scale the data and offset it anyway you would like. How about we scale it somewhat differently? How about this? Instead of scaling (LYING) use the function "Normalize."
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/esrl-co2/normalise/trend/plot/hadcrut3vgl/normalise/trend/plot/rss/normalise/trend