I'm glad to see Clams is still going.
I've been thinking about trying to use clamSpeech to provide the backbone for some kind of censorship-resistant discussion forum, something like reddit/twitter. It seems like there are hard pushes for censorship the past year or two. (My twitter account recently got suspended, so now I have the motivation of revenge.)
Would there be any objection by the Clams devs/stakeholders to me trying to do this? It could potentially land people who stake Clams in legal trouble if they are in countries that punish expression of certain ideas. And let's face it, at this point that's every country.
Though rather mundane, political/religious affiliation/speech is already added to every transaction by default (though it can be changed by the user).
Additionally, last I knew, the Just-Dice trollbox was posting random chat-lines as well.
The only warning I would personally offer would be that eventually, in order to prevent spam, transaction fees are likely to be handled differently in the future.