Re: Requesting DT members to have a clear stance on buying & selling accounts
It has been several days, and neither Lauda nor Lutpin has responded to my concerns nor have they left any trust on any of the above people.
I am curious why they do not wish to address my concerns....
Most likely because the positive contributions to the forum outweigh the negatives.I am curious why they do not wish to address my concerns....
Trading in accounts isn't bad enough that it rules out any contribution to the forum for those who are/were/tried to be a part of it. The reason the majority of the accounts dealing in accounts are being tagged as such, I expect, is due to them having little to no positive contribution to the forum.
To respond to your post in regards to what you (incorrectly) thought I was asking. You think that it would be okay for me to steal a little bit of money if I make some kind of contribution to the forum?
What you are saying is that you believe the trust system is a 'boys club' in which it's members can do as they wish, and everyone else is at the wrath of it's members.
I think the reason why Lauda and Lutpin have not left negative trust to the people mentioned above is something along the lines of :
No way Lauda would leave negative feedback to this powerful guys. Lauda was a coward and corrupted woman. She will only leave negative feedbacks to accounts who can't hit him back.
Or maybe it is something closer to along the lines of this:
Personally, I'm very skeptical and suspicious of these poorly concealed attempts at grabbing more power across the forum, at first through such "interest checks" and then by kicking up a racket about "elections" of a new global moderator...