Much of the debate surrounding bitcoin's scaling problem seems to stem from two different visions of what bitcoin should be right now: a store of value or a peer-to-peer digital cash system. Both sides agree that in the long run both of these properties should be met, but the question is: Will bitcoin hold value even if TX throughput does not scale soon or do we risk losing our first mover advantage if bitcoin is not able to fulfil its promises as a peer-to-peer cash system soon.
I would love to hear some arguments from both sides of this debate
i think bitcoin still hold value even if the transaction is need time to get confirms, and value is related with utility and i am sure that in the future, the transaction is no need too long to gets confirmed. but i am agree that we should solve the problem in confirming transaction because no one wants to be waited too long to see for full confirmed of transaction.