If the user waits that the transaction is final, he cannot be defrauded.
In your example, you isolate the merchant from the real network and feed him with a fake branch. The merchant will accept your units and add them to his version of the DAG, but since there are no witness-authored units on your branch, it will not move the stability point forward and your double-spent payment will stay unconfirmed for as long as your attack continues. Number of nodes is totally irrelevant, it is the presence of witnesses what makes a branch real.
Great, I hope now SatoNatomato sees why IOTA couldn't use the same method of peer discovery.
I now hope you understand Iotas Proof-of-Work is useless as it doesnt prevent against Sybils and is only wasting precious CPU cycles on small IoT devices. And that Iota is decentralized, but not trustless.

You sire are a scammer and a censoring scoundrel.